Buffalo — Top 5 Renovation Picks (Aug 08, 2025)

25 Campbell Rd — $199,900

  • Beds/Baths/Sqft: 2 bd / 1 ba / 1,506 sqft
  • Price per SqFt: $133
  • Lot size: 8,276 sqft
  • Year Built / Type: 1950 / Single Family Residential
  • Parking: Attached, Garage
  • Status / Last Sale: Listed (Active) / $199,900 Aug 7, 2025
  • Summary: This well-maintained home offers a bright layout with potential for a third bedroom or bonus room, and a spacious backyard ideal for outdoor activities.
  • Renovation rationale:
    • Low entry price and reasonable price per square foot at $133.
    • Older build with potential for adding a bath and creating additional living space.
  • Why these metrics matter for renovation:
    • The low price per square foot and large lot size offer significant renovation upside, allowing for expansion or reconfiguration without excessive costs.

32 Lafayette Ave — $99,999

  • Beds/Baths/Sqft: 3 bd / 1.5 ba / 1,390 sqft
  • Price per SqFt: $72
  • Lot size: 3,591 sqft
  • Year Built / Type: 1920 / Single Family Residential
  • Status / Last Sale: Listed (Active) / $99,999 Aug 8, 2025
  • Summary: This charming home features a functional layout and offers a unique opportunity for renovation in a revitalizing neighborhood.
  • Renovation rationale:
    • Extremely low price per square foot at $72 provides a great entry point for renovation.
    • Older build with potential for adding a second bathroom and cosmetic updates.
  • Why these metrics matter for renovation:
    • The low price per square foot and established neighborhood dynamics suggest a strong potential for value appreciation post-renovation.

907 Tonawanda St — $119,000

  • Beds/Baths/Sqft: 4 bd / 1 ba / 1,639 sqft
  • Price per SqFt: $73
  • Lot size: 2,790 sqft
  • Year Built / Type: 1900 / Single Family Residential
  • Status / Last Sale: Listed (Active) / $119,000 Aug 7, 2025
  • Summary: This spacious home features generously sized bedrooms and a walk-up attic, providing ample potential for expansion and personalization.
  • Renovation rationale:
    • Low price per square foot at $73, making it an attractive investment for renovation.
    • Older build with a full attic offering possibilities for additional living space.
  • Why these metrics matter for renovation:
    • The combination of low entry price and potential for attic conversion aligns well with renovation budgets and future market value increases.

25 Campbell Rd — $199,900

  • Beds/Baths/Sqft: 2 bd / 1 ba / 1,506 sqft
  • Price per SqFt: $133
  • Lot size: 8,276 sqft
  • Year Built / Type: 1950 / Single Family Residential
  • Parking: Attached, Garage
  • Status / Last Sale: Listed (Active) / $199,900 Aug 7, 2025
  • Summary: This well-maintained home offers a bright layout with potential for a third bedroom or bonus room, and a spacious backyard ideal for outdoor activities.
  • Renovation rationale:
    • Low entry price and reasonable price per square foot at $133.
    • Older build with potential for adding a bath and creating additional living space.
  • Why these metrics matter for renovation:
    • The low price per square foot and large lot size offer significant renovation upside, allowing for expansion or reconfiguration without excessive costs.

76 Huetter Ave — $189,900

  • Beds/Baths/Sqft: 4 bd / 1 ba / 1,470 sqft
  • Price per SqFt: $129
  • Lot size: 2,400 sqft
  • Year Built / Type: 1912 / Single Family Residential
  • Parking: No Garage
  • Status / Last Sale: Listed (Active) / $189,900 Aug 7, 2025
  • Summary: This well-maintained bungalow features four bedrooms and a formal dining room, providing a solid foundation for further updates and renovations.
  • Renovation rationale:
    • Reasonable price per square foot at $129, allowing for renovation potential.
    • Older build provides opportunities for adding bathrooms and modernizing the interior.
  • Why these metrics matter for renovation:
    • The price per square foot and layout flexibility can facilitate a budget-friendly renovation that enhances both livability and resale value.

1 Like

I guess the view are the same

The second one hits hard with its natural look

Okay. Thanks for this :folded_hands:t5: