Debate Sparked: Risk Algorithm vs. Human Judges in US Courts - Harvard Study Reveals Misalignments

The use of risk algorithm in US courts has sparked a debate as it often suggests harsher decisions compared to human judges. A study conducted at Harvard University indicates that the algorithm’s recommendations may not align with human judgment, potentially impacting pretrial outcomes. This highlights the complexity of relying solely on technology in judicial processes. As we navigate the realm of algorithms, it’s crucial to balance technological advancements with human insight for fair and just decisions. Just like in home renovations, a blend of modern tools and human touch can lead to the best results. Read more about this intriguing study at New Scientist.